Currently when I try to describe myself I use the words “software craftsman” as an equivalent to “software developer, continuously trying to improve his skills and craft”.
Let me explain what I mean by “software craftsman”:
- I mean being professional as software developer
- Trying not only to create working code, trying to create simple, easy to maintain code.
- Trying not only to create the code that the business required, also trying to help the business to growth (with different solutions, even without using code). Adding steadily value to the business.
- In order to be a good professional there is a strong need to learn and improve our skills, tools and practices. Or even look for new ones.
- IMHO a good process for learning or improving ours skills is participating in the community of professional software developers. In this process the mentor / apprentice format works very well to improve our skills.
In fact, for my, this definition can be a good option, but currently, the term agile is even more confuse that craftsmanship.
For me, at least in my experience, the development of applications and systems has more in common with a craft than with an engineering. Engineering is the application of mathematics, empirical evidence and scientific knowledge, so it is possible to plan, predict and control. IMHO software development for non trivial systems requires sense and respond and other approaches can derive in a false sense of control.
Some kind of software efforts are more adapted to a engineering approach (algorithms, compilers, software for science), but in my case, this is the exception, not the norm.
So, currently in my linkedin profile I indicate that I work as Software Craftsman… I also indicate that I work as a Shaman, but this is different history :-)
Post a Comment